You are looking for information, articles, knowledge about the topic nail salons open on sunday near me canon ef 70 200mm f 4l usm test on Google, you do not find the information you need! Here are the best content compiled and compiled by the https://toplist.prairiehousefreeman.com team, along with other related topics such as: canon ef 70 200mm f 4l usm test Canon EF 70-200mm f 2.8L USM, canon 70-200 f4 cũ, Canon lens 70 200mm f4l USM, Canon 70 200 f4 IS II đánh giá, lens canon 70-200 f4 is ii cũ, canon 70-200 f4 review, sony 70-200 f4 cũ, 70-200 f4 non is
Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L USM Lens Review
- Article author: www.the-digital-picture.com
- Reviews from users: 30843
Ratings - Top rated: 3.5
- Lowest rated: 1
- Summary of article content: Articles about
Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L USM Lens Review
The Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L USM Lens focuses very fast, very quietly and very accurately thanks to Canon’s excellent Ring USM (Ultrasonic Motor). FTM (Full Time … … - Most searched keywords: Whether you are looking for
Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L USM Lens Review
The Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L USM Lens focuses very fast, very quietly and very accurately thanks to Canon’s excellent Ring USM (Ultrasonic Motor). FTM (Full Time … Is the Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L USM Lens right for you? Learn all you need to know in The-Digital-Picture.com’s review! - Table of Contents:
Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L USM Review
- Article author: www.imaging-resource.com
- Reviews from users: 49634 Ratings
- Top rated: 5.0
- Lowest rated: 1
- Summary of article content: Articles about Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L USM Review It is an exceptional value and gives incredible sharpness for a zoom. The focusing is fast and accurate. The lens itself is light and is not hard to carry all … …
- Most searched keywords: Whether you are looking for Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L USM Review It is an exceptional value and gives incredible sharpness for a zoom. The focusing is fast and accurate. The lens itself is light and is not hard to carry all … Looking for a Canon 70-200mm lens review? Read on to find out what we uncovered in our objective optical lab tests.
- Table of Contents:
Canon
EF 70-200mm f4L USM
Canon EF 70-200mm f4L USM User Reviews
Canon EF 70-200mm f/4 USM L – Review / Test Report
- Article author: www.opticallimits.com
- Reviews from users: 6318 Ratings
- Top rated: 3.1
- Lowest rated: 1
- Summary of article content: Articles about Canon EF 70-200mm f/4 USM L – Review / Test Report The build quality of this lens is excellent – no wobbling and smooth controls. The lens features a ring-type USM drive so AF speed is extremely fast. When … …
- Most searched keywords: Whether you are looking for Canon EF 70-200mm f/4 USM L – Review / Test Report The build quality of this lens is excellent – no wobbling and smooth controls. The lens features a ring-type USM drive so AF speed is extremely fast. When … Photography, Lens, Lens Test, Lens Review, Lens Tests, Lens Reviews, Camera, SLR, D-SLR, DSLR, Digital SLR, Canon, EOS, Nikon, Olympus, Minolta, Pentax, SLR lensesOpticalLimits – Lens reviews and beyond!
- Table of Contents:
FM Reviews – Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L USM
- Article author: www.fredmiranda.com
- Reviews from users: 45814 Ratings
- Top rated: 4.2
- Lowest rated: 1
- Summary of article content: Articles about FM Reviews – Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L USM The images are sharp, the auto focusing is fast. The build quality is superb. I love the look of the pictures the lens makes, the contrast and the nice bokeh. I … …
- Most searched keywords: Whether you are looking for FM Reviews – Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L USM The images are sharp, the auto focusing is fast. The build quality is superb. I love the look of the pictures the lens makes, the contrast and the nice bokeh. I … High-performance, L-series telephoto zoom lens combining light weight and compactness with an f/4 maximum aperture. Inner focusing and the ring USM enable quick and quiet autofocusing. Also, a circular polarizing filter can be attached and used without difficulty because the front lens element does not rotate during focusing. The tripod collar (sold separately) is the same one used with the EF 300mm f/4L USM.
- Table of Contents:
See more articles in the same category here: https://toplist.prairiehousefreeman.com/blog/.
Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L USM Lens Review
Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L USM Lens Review
Note: The Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L USM Lens has been replaced by the The Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L USM Lens has been replaced by the Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L IS II USM Lens
The Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L USM Lens is arguably Canon’s best value “L” Lens, combining professional grade build and optical qualities.
Though solidly built, the 70-200 f/4L is relatively light (25 oz / 705g). Actually it is very light and small compared to the much more substantial Canon EF 70-200 f/2.8L Lens or the Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM Lens. This lens is not a burden to carry for long periods of time but has a high quality, solid feel.
At 3″ (76mm) in diameter, the 70-200 f/4 is relatively narrow for its 6.8″ (172mm) length. I more frequently use larger diameter lenses, so this is one of the 70-200 f/4’s instantly recognized features for me personally. It is not a bad thing – just different. I’m sure those with small hands appreciate this feature.
Pictured above from left to right are the Canon 24-70mm f/2.8L USM Lens, the Canon 70-200mm f/4L USM Lens and the Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM Lens.
Results from the Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L USM Lens will make you smile when reviewing at 100% on a monitor. This lens is very sharp wide open and improves only slightly when stopped down – and primarily in the corners at the wide end of the focal length range. Very slight barrel distortion is noticeable at 70mm on a Full Frame body. Distortion disappears by around 100mm and is insignificant on a 1.3x or 1.6x FOVCF body. Vignetting is very well controlled – full frame users might notice slight vignetting in the corners at f/4. CA is very well controlled.
Images from the 70-200 f/4L have great color and bokeh (foreground/background blur quality). The 8-blade aperture opens to a constant f/4 at all focal length ranges. This is a very nice feature as exposure settings do not require a change as the lens is zoomed through the focal lengths. F/4 is not fast and is not slow. F/4 is narrow enough to allow the smaller lens size and weight. F/4 is wide enough to create some background diffusion in this focal length range. F/4 is wide enough to not require bright light for handholding. However, I do not consider this a low light lens. You will likely need a flash when shooting indoors after the sun sets.
The Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L USM Lens focuses very fast, very quietly and very accurately thanks to Canon’s excellent Ring USM (Ultrasonic Motor). FTM (Full Time Manual) focusing is enabled. The focus and zoom rings are very nicely sized and turn very smoothly. The 70-200 f/4 does not extend with zooming or focusing – and the front element does not rotate.
With a minimum focus distance of 3.9′ (1.2 m), the 70-200 f/4 yields a maximum magnification of .21x. This value is reasonable for flower pictures and close portraits. Adding a 12mm Extension Tube will take this figure to .28x at 200mm, but better results come from the addition of a 25mm Extension Tube – yielding a .42x magnification at 70mm.
As the 70-200 f/4L is compatible with the Canon Extender EF 1.4x II and the Canon Extender EF 2x II, these are popular accessories for this lens. With the 1.4x, the 70-200 f/4 becomes a 98-280mm f/5.6 lens that retains excellent image quality (adding more barrel distortion and some additional CA). But, image quality starts declining more noticeably with the 2x and the resulting 140-400mm f/8 lens only autofocuses on Canon’s 1-Series bodies. This combination also results in a very dark viewfinder. The extenders increase the maximum magnification to .31x and .45x.
Above from left to right are the Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L USM Lens, Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L IS USM Lens, Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L USM Lens and Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM Lens. The two f/2.8 lenses are shown with their included tripod rings. The f/2.8 IS lens is shown with an optional Wimberley P20 Lens Plate attached to the tripod ring. The same lenses are shown below with their included lens hoods attached.
Filters are always popular lens accessories … The 70-200 f/4 has a 67mm filter thread size – the relatively small-sized filters do not cost a fortune.
The Canon ET-74 Lens Hood and an inexpensive lens pouch are included in the box when the 70-200 f/4L is purchased from a reputable retailer. The Canon Tripod Mount Ring A II (W) (or the prior non-II A version), although relatively expensive, can be purchased as an accessory. The tripod collar is nice to have, but with a solid tripod/head combination it is not required.
There are MANY uses for the Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L USM Lens, but portrait photography is one of the best. Classic portrait focal lengths range from 85mm to 135mm effective focal lengths (field of view crop factor included). The 70-200 f/4.0L lens comes with most (or all for full frame and 1.3x body users) of those mms included. I often use even higher focal lengths for tight portraits – 200mm and/or a 1.6x FOVCF body allows for these tightly-framed shots.
Outdoor sports photography is another popular use for the Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L USM Lens. It is an ideal lens for young children’s soccer matches when mounted on a 1.6x FOVCF body. You might want to add a Canon Extender EF 1.4x depending on the size of the subjects and their playing field. The Canon 70-200 f4 lens is generally too slow for indoor action photography unless you can utilize an accessory flash such as the Canon 580EX Flash. Early or late outdoor action sports photography is better handled with the Canon EF 70-200 f/2.8L Lens or the Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM Lens. Heavily overcast days are also a challenge for action sports photography with the 70-200 f/4L.
Need a walk-in-the-park or a beach lens? The 70-200 f/4L is ideal for my uses. Combining excellent image quality with relatively light weight and small size, the Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L USM Lens has a good focal length range for grabbing candids of the kids and family at play.
General wildlife and nature photography is area where the 70-200 f/4L may not be ideal, but often finds use in. Depending on their size and distance, wild subjects may not frame tightly enough with the bare 70-200 focal length. But, this lens starts having some nice reach while retaining very good image quality when paired with the Canon Extender EF 1.4x II on a 1.6x body. Wary small birds and animals will likely require a longer lens altogether.
When thinking about a landscape lens, many photographers immediately think wide angle lenses. Wide angle lenses can take in vast scenes, but the 70-200mm focal length range is a favorite of professional landscape photographers as it yields beautiful compressed landscape images. When photographing landscapes, wide apertures are generally not needed as narrower apertures are generally used for greater depth of field. When photographing landscapes, packing light makes the long hikes often required to get to the beauty easier. As some of the beauty of landscape photography is in the form of flowers and other smaller objects, the magnification ability of the 70-200 f/4 is useful for this purpose. Thus, the Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L USM Lens is ideally suited for landscape photography use.
Those contemplating a 70-200 f/4L purchase are typically considering the Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM Lens as well. Priced similarly with an extended focal length range and an excellent implementation of IS, this lens fills many of the same requirements as the 70-200 f/4. I usually recommend the 70-200 f/4 over the 70-300 IS because of its physical and optical advantages, but read the 70-300 review to find out which is better for your needs.
The Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM Lens is a GREAT upgrade from the 70-200 f/4 L, but only if you need f/2.8 (lets twice as much light in) and/or IS – or weather sealing (the 70-200 f/4 is not weather sealed). You will not find the IS version’s image quality to be much better – Full frame corner sharpness is better on the IS lens until the end of the focal length range where they equal out. The f/4 version performs better than the IS lens with Canon Extenders when used at the 200mm setting until both are stopped down to f/8 or so. An f/2.8 aperture will create a more diffuse background blur. The IS version carries significantly more weight and costs much more than the smaller f/4 version.
If you cannot afford a Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L IS USM Lens, Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L Lens or a Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM Lens, the 70-200 f/4L is for you. If you do not need your 70-200mm lens to be faster than f/4 and don’t need IS, the Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L USM Lens is your lens. The 70-200 f/4L is a great value and a highly recommended lens.
Bringing you this site is my full-time job (typically 60-80 hours per week). Thus, I depend solely on the commissions received from you using the links on this site to make any purchase. I am grateful for your support! – Bryan Buy Now ►
(Using the links on this site to make any purchase provides support for this site
This site and my family depend on your support. Can you help right now?
Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L USM Review
9.4/10 average of 48 review(s) Build Quality 9.7/10 Image Quality 9.6/10
9 out of 10 points and recommended by transiently (26 reviews) and Sharpness is very good even at maximum aperture, at all focal lengths, as are almost all optical characteristics. By my standards, it is a large and obtrusive lens. The white finish screams “photographer” which I find unhelpful. The designers allowed higher levels of linear distortion than I expected, so I’ve had a few bendy horizons. It is a real luxury knowing I can shoot fast-moving subjects at maximum aperture and get superb sharpness – this is what really distinguishes its optical performance from lesser lenses.
AF works well. Zoom control has great feel.
I find more linear distortion than I would like, but you wouldn’t normally notice, and otherwise it’s wonderful optically. I have no other complaints. I would use it much more if it was lighter, and not big and white, but it’s still great. And other Canon L telephoto zooms are even bigger and heavier!
8 out of 10 points and recommended by nestos (1 reviews) and sharp, build quality slow AF In action (sports) photography, AF seems a bit slow, sometimes out of focus when shooting in burst modus (Canon 7D)
10 out of 10 points and recommended by lomenak (2 reviews) and great IQ and build, lightweight for its category lack of IS with those focal lengths, but you can get the IS version if this is a concern Another great lens from Canon. I have loved this lens very much when using in tripod, unfortunately cannot use those focal lengths without IS.
9 out of 10 points and recommended by marp (2 reviews) and price, sharpness, build quality, size none This is my first “L” lens and I really like it. The images are sharp, the auto focusing is fast. The build quality is superb.
I love the look of the pictures the lens makes, the contrast and the nice bokeh.
I chose this one over the f/2.8 mostly because of the size. It is not very heavy. Also the smaller size is an advantage, if you travel a lot like me.
If you wish, have a look at some pictures taken with this lens in this set on my flickr. all were take with my Canon EOS 7D.
9 out of 10 points and recommended by JeanP (4 reviews) and L-optics, lightweight none This is indeed a very nice portraitlens on my 400D. Use this lens on f4 and further up to f14 and your results will be nice and with good contrast.
I had to send my lens with my 400D to a service point for calibration.My copy had focusproblems (also on a new 7D at the shop)
After this calibration (lens is paired with camera) my pictures are very sharp and nice.
This calibration is a well known (at least at the servicecenter) issue and is carried out under warranty.
I am very satisfied with this level of Canonservice.
9 out of 10 points and recommended by kaci (10 reviews) and center sharpness, colours, contrast, AF, price, size corner sharpness, focal length 200mm My review is based on using this lens on full-frame camera = 5d. Center sharpness is amazing at f4 – f5.6 from 70mm to 140mm, but corners are really soft. At 200mm overall sharpness is quite weak. Colours, contrast and bokeh are wonderfull, the AF great.
I prefer using my 85/1.8 and 135/2L but sometimes the zoom is needed. For its price I find it really worthy lens.
9 out of 10 points and recommended by barbaranne423 (1 reviews) and Clarity, weight, color rendering, silet auto focus none I have owned this les for a month or so and LOVE it! Color redition is fabulous; clarity is superb but; after all, it is an L lens.
The silence of the auto focus is really nice. I like the way the lens looks and handles.
I have nothing but praise for this lens.
9 out of 10 points and recommended by jt354 (9 reviews) and Sharpness at wide end, color reproduction, lightweight, build quality 200mm softness, poor AF performance Judging by the reviews on this site, I’m assuming my copy to be an anomaly. I bought a gently-used 2004 70-200mm f/4L and have been fairly unimpressed. AF performance is terrible, with severe backfocus on all images. The lens is sharp from 70mm-135mm wide open, but is very soft at 200mm. The build quality is excellent, metal barrel and internals with smooth focus and zoom rings. Furthermore, the lens is lightweight for the focal range. Unfortunately, none of this can justify the issues my copy has at the most frequently used focal length.
Edit: I recently exchanged my lens for a new copy which is sharper at 200mm and autofocuses much more accurately. The lens still remains just a bit soft at the long end compared to Canon’s prime offerings, the 200mm f/2.8 II and the 200mm f/2. But it’s certainly a versatile lens, and an excellent choice for travel and backpacking. I wouldn’t hesitate to use it with the Canon Extender 1.4x.
10 out of 10 points and recommended by Nikoboyd (12 reviews) and Decent optics, superb construction, Light weight, Lightning fast focusing speed White color (I prefer black lens barrel) Use this lens for 9 months. I can’t complain anything. This thing is too good. If you want a 70-XXX telephoto, it is a no brainer.
10 out of 10 points and recommended by MrAdventure (6 reviews) and Solid build, light, sharp wide open, fast AF still trying to find something to gripe about This lens is awesome.
I hear lot’s of grumbling about theslow aperture being f/4. It’s never limited me in anyway, in fact with the new hi-iso bodies, it’s a moot point in many cases. I shoot portraits, products, landscape and wildlife with this lens and wow.
Sharp wide open and right across the frame from edge to edge. Color and contrast are stunning…I smile whenever I pixel peep.
10 out of 10 points and recommended by Barry (6 reviews) and Excellent lens – nothing else compares! None Rented this lens as I want to buy this one. I use a tripod so IS is not required. In SA we have too much light, so f/4 is perfect. What I don’t get is that the cons listed for this lens i.e. aperture, IS are available on other iterations of this lens, so don’t list these as cons! Canon has addressed these supposed cons with other versions, so if you have a problem, buy the more expensive lens. Thanks, Canon, for making this amazing lens available to all owners with differing budgets.
What I did find is that this lens offers brilliant, sharp shots across the zoom range, easily equivalent to the prime at the similar range. Having this is the same as having 3 or 4 primes.
Brilliant lens, Canon – no other lens compares!
Just received mine (used). ZAR5000. And it is incredible!
(I still use my 85mm f/1.8 for portraits for the creamy bokeh.)
10 out of 10 points and recommended by teybartolome (1 reviews) and USM, light weight, L f/4: not too good in low light but can be compensated using flash. 😀 You usually get for what you pay. This time, you get more. 😀
Pros: Fast focusing, awesome IQ, awesome bokeh even at f/4, super sharp.
Cons: The widest aperture is f/4 but it’s not a hindrance to take good amazing photos. 😀 It’s still an L and you know what that means. 😀
10 out of 10 points and recommended by mike051051 (2 reviews) and Very rapid focus, smooth zoom and focus rings, very sharp at all apertures and focal lengths, good weight and balance, effective lens hood haven’t found any yet Bought this lens last year prior to a week’s vacation on which it performed superbly. It’s become one of my favorite lenses. Used it today indoors for candids of the grand kids.
It just never fails to satisfy. I can use it in situations where I wouldn’t have thought to use a 200mm lens before, thanks to the constant f/4.0 aperture and the way it balances so nicely on a 40D.
The contrast, sharpness, clarity and background blur of this lens is definitely first rate. The only problem is that it’s sort of spoiled me for anything other than an L lens.
9 out of 10 points and recommended by wrongnumber (2 reviews) and sharp, solidly built, usm big, obvious It’s a great lens, excellent focus, use a tripod for longer lengths / longer exposure combinations. I don’t have any complaints good price for the lens and great reach on a crop body sensor (XSI), I wish it were shorter or black. I will upgrade to the IS version at some point.
10 out of 10 points and recommended by wowwy91801 (2 reviews) and Very sharp, quick focus even in very low indoor lighting, white colored, pro quality, zoom does not extend. Large lens hood, minor difference between 135mm and 200mm range. After reading much reviews about Canon’s quality control is lacking and buyers eventually returning their new purchase for calibration, I bought this one used.
I tested this lens in really low indoor lighting and the focus is amazing. Never thought this lens was able to focus at a specific spot where I was aiming at. This was attached to my 30D. The image quality is superb. Even though this lens has a max of f/4, I was able to get really sharp images hand held under indoor lighting.
I don’t think the white color is a con, like other users think, because it does appear to give the impression that it is a pro quality build. I do think that the lens hood is ridiculously large and takes up too much space in my bag.
If I get the money, I’ll spring for the 70-200L F2.8 IS. But in the meantime, this lens will definitely meet my expectations. At $500-$600 retail, I think it’s a steal.
For those who don’t need the 2.8 or IS or don’t have the money, get this one instead. This is one satisfying lens for sure.
10 out of 10 points and recommended by levicki (2 reviews) and After my bad experience with Sigma 24-70mm F/2.8 EX DG I gave up on chasing a good copy — I just bought this lens instead and it is fantastic. No cons, just pros! Sharp on both ends, ultra fast and accurate focusing, silent, well balanced with my 40D. For below the 70mm I will get some prime or a cheaper 17-70mm lens and be done with it.
10 out of 10 points and recommended by that_fox (3 reviews) and Excellent IQ, cheap, great build quality, got my best shot ever with this lens A bit short for what I do (wildlife), no tripod ring, Æ’/4 I purchased this lens months ago and since then have been rewarded with many great images with it. The image quality is unmatched, superbly sharp even at 200mm. I got one spectacular shot with this lens that has received thousands upon thousands of positive remarks. That shot wouldn’t have had the same great praise with anything less than the great IQ of this lens.
I do wish that this lens came with a tripod ring however. I find that this lens causes the camera to not be rock steady on a tripod when using the camera’s tripod mount. I also wish that this lens was ƒ/2.8, but at this price I can’t complain at all. I very highly recommend this lens, but beware it will get you addicted the L lenses.
9 out of 10 points and recommended by f43tgv (16 reviews) and Price, quality F4 This is another real bargain! I have used both the 70-200 2.8 and this lens, a copy of which I now own. The image quality is indistinguishable
.
If you dont need the 2.8, buy this. Its lighter, easier to handhold, and sooo much easier to carry around all day.
The test of this lens is spot on, you get so much more than the lowly ( well by canon L lens prices anyway) purchase price may suggest.
I have not found it too slow in general use, nor have i ever thought that the addition of IS on its more recent sister lens is worth the significant price difference.
The quality of the results is so good that increasing the ISO setting in poor light doesnt make you pay too much in terms of picture quality.
If you are a pro, buy the 2.8, or the F4 IS, otherwise save your money and enjoy this superb lens.
10 out of 10 points and recommended by carskick (3 reviews) and Sharpness, contrast, color, fast accurate AF, great build The IS version costs twice as much For Canon’s cheapest L lens, it is astonishing in just about every category. It’s not really heavy, it has good range, descent MFD, and awesome image quality. That really about sums it up.
To be nit picky, I would like a closer MFD, maybe 0.7 meters instead of 1.2m would be great for near macro shots, or more versatility at the lens’ wider end. Also, I wish the IS version were not twice the price of this lens. For sports, I wish I had the F2.8 version, but F4 is fine for almost every other application.
9 out of 10 points and recommended by ghost (2 reviews) and Sharp, Fast AF, Sexy white lens, Great price for an L Too prominent white lens barrel, F4 is not the fastest, would prefer longer reach Initially I wasn’t sure what’s with the hype of this lens. Lots of photogs love it. I used it a few times and didn’t see the hoopla. Then one day BH had a sale simultaneously with Canon’s rebates, so I picked one up thinking if I didn’t like it I can always sell it. L lens keep their value.
After shooting it here and there I was blown away at how sharp the images turned out in RAW. My 30d was set to 0 on all settings. Colours and contrast were spot on. I do enjoy using this lens more and more. I do wish sometimes it had a longer reach. Great lens and sure to become a legend in the Canon lens history.
10 out of 10 points and recommended by the_photo_nut (2 reviews) and excellent quality, build, IQ and price. none Just absolutely the best bargain lens Canon has ever produced. For the price, you are getting an “L” lens with all the “L” quality and build. Lens produces awesome IQ, color and contrast. With good lighting, you cannon beat the pics this lens produces. On my 30D body this lens is so sharp than the pics jump out at you. The detail is fantastic. I had to do very little post processing on them. Highly recommended lens to all Canon users. Enjoy !!!
10 out of 10 points and recommended by noksukau (4 reviews) and Absolute stunner, very portable, looks superb and shots to match Only what it says on the tin, will give you a taste for more Just a quickie, as there’s not much left to say! It really is as great as everyone says and I still feel a tinge of excitement everytime I mount this on my camera.
Focus is sensational, you can pluck birds from the sky with ease and the snappy zoom ring takes plenty of abuse and allows you to go end-to-end with a quick snick of the wrist. The lens also hangs very nicely on all the bodies I’ve tried it on, feeling like a dangling weapon, always ready to fire.
That said, beware! Once you see what it can do it will give you an itch for more of what it offers and will frustrate you that you can’t use your favourite lens all the time. 200mm on a cropped sensor and no IS means this lens goes to bed before your kids do. If I had to do this all over again I’d get the new IS version. As it is the vanilla f/4 holds its value remarkably well and with high build quality is a safe second hand buy. You can practically rent it until you can afford the IS version and have a load of photographic fun in the meantime.
Ben.
10 out of 10 points and recommended by fergusonjr (15 reviews) and Low Price. Superb Image quality. Excellent Sharpness Not for low light (f/4) Wow, wow, and wow! Quick, buy one of these before Canon realizes they’re undercharging for them! This is a really really great lens, and an incredible bargain. In fact, the very fact that you’re getting a bargain makes the images seem so much nicer!
This lens makes some of the nicest images I’ve ever seen. It’s obvious just by looking through the viewfinder that you’re getting a better picture coming through. The sharpness and brilliant colors are amazing. The lens itself is a pleasure to use, with its super quiet and fast autofocus, FTM focusing, and solid, substantial build-quality. I like the fact that the lens stays the same length when zooming, and despite all the glass, it’s relatively light . . . lighter than the 24-70 f/2.8 anyway.
This is a remarkable lens. IS would be nice, but this is more of good-light, outdoor lens anyway, so I haven’t found myself wanting. Certainly, if you’re going to be shooting indoors a lot, the f/2.8 lens is a better choice, but it also costs twice as much. For most uses, this f/4 lens does amazing work.
0 out of 10 points and recommended by MJG (5 reviews) and Excellent image quality, versatile range, L punch None This is the cheapest L lens, and there is actually one big Con: It will get you hooked on the L line. I had the very fine 70-210, but that extra notch that the 70-200L has is difficult to describe, but very noticable.
Image and build quality are excellent, and so is AF speed and accuracy. The zoom is ring type, and as such there is no danger of creeping (the 70-210 does creep). The range is versatile, especially on 1.6 crop where it amounts to 100-320. Also, this lens goes very well with the 1.4 extender, at least in good light conditions.
Note: price is converted from EUR, after special rebate
9 out of 10 points and recommended by jdf (8 reviews) and Great Built quality! Fast autofocus No tripod ring I have bought this lens in September, i the beginning i didn’t like it much but after a few days on the field i looked to be much better than i had hopped.
I have used it on 1.6 crop body. The image is very sharp wide open from F.4.0 to f9.0 at 70mm or 200mm. So it’s harmonic. Even with a 1.4 Kenko TC it gaved me great results. One of my best lenses.
The AF is very fast and precise, and you can manual overide it’s AF. Zoom rings are also smooth.
One thing i have noticed is its colors, are very vibrant and contrasty.
10 out of 10 points and recommended by djmccorm (2 reviews) and Light, sharp, superb image quality, reasonable cost. f/4 aperture and lack of IS This was my first L lens with my Rebel XT. It is simply a phenomenal lens. The images are razor sharp and the colors simply amazing. Occasionally I wish for f/2.8 or IS, but with high ISO I usually still get the shots I want. Even if I got the f/2.8 I would keep this lens because it is so much lighter. Definitely a fantastic lifetime investment. Never buy a lens that you wouldn’t keep forever!
10 out of 10 points and recommended by amelo14 (10 reviews) and Stunning Image Quality, Beautiful lightweight design, fast USM, L-Build, WOW factor, low COST. Really NONE; but one could mention aperture, expensive tripod ring and no IS. I only own 1 L-lens, the 70-200 f4. The first time I handheld it I could not believe how lightweight it was. And when I looked into the viewfinder, really, I could not believe the beautiful image created. In short, if you only have funds for one L lens, then this is a serious candidate. Overall you get much more than you pay for and perhaps you just have to learn to seek those opportunities when this lens shines, that is, bright days and outdoors.
If you are worried about the expensive canon tripod ring, there is another, less expensive option by ROXSEN, mentioned at: http://www.pbase.com/lightrules/image/70883547
9 out of 10 points and recommended by ne1rom (6 reviews) and Very sharp from wide open, relatively light non-IS Nothing much to say – it’s almost perfect in any way of testing. Cant find some cons… maybe IS-version will be even better.
So my opinion, if you dont want to pay much more for 70-200/2.8L IS – the lens is your choice. It has no visible flaws.
Highly recommended for APS-C or FF!
10 out of 10 points and recommended by amolas (6 reviews) and Price, Build quality, constant aperture, internal focusing none Very sharp, low distortion, color repected. This is one of my favorite lens !
It quality is near a prime lens !
If you are looking for a 70-200 lens, this one is for you !
10 out of 10 points and recommended by SteveR12682 (10 reviews) and Very sharp wide open, light weight, great value None This is the perfect lens for anyone looking for a relatively light weight telephoto lens with superb image quality. This lens is super sharp wide open and does very well with a 1.4 teleconverter. It is one of Canon’s best values in an L lens.
7 out of 10 points and recommended by boysennumba5 (3 reviews) and Cost, weight/quality, image quality aperture This lens is primarily for anybody looking for a zoom lens with good image quality that is also affordable, with the abundance of consumer-quality 70/75-300mm range lenses, most of them really don’t provide sufficient image quality for a serious photographer.
This is relatively inexpensive pro-quality lens that offers some major benefits: 1. is obviously the price while supplying great image quality. 2. Is the weight for a pro quality lens.
I recently took a backpacking trip in Colorado (1 week long, so every pound on your back adds up FAST), and this was one of the 2 lenses I took with. On a 20D (also a great camera to bring on these kind of things if you don’t want the weight of a pro body), the lens provides sufficient reach for most any purposes except for extreme-range wildlife.
The only thing worth mentioning against it is that because of the slowish aperture (medium-fast for a consumer, but slow for a pro) or IS, the lens has limited use on very cloudy days, or during twilight without a tripod.
The build quality also seemed quite sufficient for me. I’m somewhat clumsy, and never baby my gear, so I’ve got nicks and scratches all over the barrel, and this lens has never failed me in an operational or image quality standpoint.
All around a great lens for anybody who wants good quality in a relatively light package.
9 out of 10 points and recommended by caries (4 reviews) and Sharpness, color none This is one of the most sucessful Canon lenses. For the price it sells for it provides great sharpness and beautiful color. Great on my D20.
10 out of 10 points and recommended by photofanatic (9 reviews) and Clean colour, sharp, fast focus, non-extending barrel none I love this lens! It gives beautiful vibrant colour and sharpness across the full frame when paired with a 20D. Very fast and accurate focusing, even in low light. A joy to use!
10 out of 10 points and recommended by mebailey (21 reviews) and This lens was my first non-kit lens. It is an exceptional value and gives incredible sharpness for a zoom. The focusing is fast and accurate. The lens itself is light and is not hard to carry all day. I use it for baseball games on a crop body which is just about perfect. It takes the 1.4TC well without much image degradation.
10 out of 10 points and recommended by LAB (1 reviews) and Excellent image quality While I use this lens for a variety of outdoor photography situations with excellent results, my main need was for a high quality zoom lens to use for low-light theater photography. When I was shooting film with my Canon T-90 and a Tokina 70-200 f/2.8 lens (using an 80A filter to make the on camera color correction for daylight film) usually using Porta 800 or Extapress or similar with good results.
When I made the move to digital (Canon 5D) I ideally wanted a fast lens (f/2.8). However, this Canon f/4 lens works very well for low-light digitial theater photography. I shoot from a tripod during dress rehearsals. The ability to dial up the ISO “on the fly” as needed or using exposure compensation produces outstanding results under this situation.
Strongly recommmed this lens!
9 out of 10 points and recommended by pixnat (4 reviews) and superb lens : sharp, contrasty, fast focus, lightweight white color The best bang for the bucks!
I have this lens for one year now and I’m always impressed by the pics I get from it.
– Sharp at all focal lenght
– contrasty and beautiful colors
– smooth bokeh
– very fast focus
– compact, nice for travel
– superb build quality
I use it mainly for nature shots and potraits.
For taking pics in dim light condition, f/4 is a bit slow.
My only complaint : it’s color. It screams “look at me!” Can be a problem when you want to take discrete pictures.
9 out of 10 points and recommended by kirehe (9 reviews) and sharp, relatively fast, USM large and white Beautifully sharp, even wide open. Fast focusing due to USM. Comes with hood (as do all Ls), meaning you don’t have to fork out an extra ~$40.
Only con: tends to draw ‘pro’ attention, which can be bad if you’re try to be inconspiciuos.
10 out of 10 points and recommended by Muiderburght (13 reviews) and Sharp!; good build; fine colors; light long You can read it everywhere on the intenet and I’ll tell you again: this is Canon’s best deal. This lens is so sharp it hurts your eyes. It’s also the first lens that made me realize that a lens can influence the end colors of apicture. This one provides exceptionally bright colors (for lack of a better word). It is now available with IS too. Haven’t tested that one though. Mostly an outdoor lens with high shutter speeds for me, I dont really have a need for the IS on this lens. If you want it for inside and portrait use, you’d probably first look at the f/2.8 (and then at the available IS on that one).
10 out of 10 points and recommended by DOA (1 reviews) and Affordable, Beautiful boken, Quality build. low light preformance Love this lens, no comparsion to the 18-55kit lens from the Canon 30D. Sharpness right out to 100%, which we all want and deserve. Beautiful boken, love the 3D affect from this lens.
I would recommend a tripod or atleast a monopod to fully take advantage of it’s capabilty. Most all poor shots come from camera shake, put this baby on a tripod with mirror lock up or timer and you will immediately see the difference.
I put the 1.4Canon extender on and could not notice any degradation of picture quality, sending a squirrel shot from this set up to a contest. This speaks for itself as to my recommendation of this fine lens.
D.O.Abolit
9 out of 10 points and recommended by dccps (13 reviews) and Outstandingly sharp, flare well controlled, relatively light slow aperture (f/4.0) is not ideal for some sports This lens is an excellent choice for all but night shots at baseball or football games where an F/2.8 would be better. Otherwise images are outstanding with remarkable resolution and excellent color. With it’s weight, I don’t really know if IS would be a big add to the value of this optic… it’s light and easily balances on a 20D.
8 out of 10 points and recommended by henris (8 reviews) and lightweight, great color f/4 aperture is slow I owned this lens and then sold it on ebay. It was good, but I just couldn’t like it enough. I eventually got a 2.8 IS version and love it much more.
I would recommend this lens as a lightweight or traveling telephoto lens.
9 out of 10 points and recommended by gadgetguy (62 reviews) and lightweight, excellent optics, build quality none One of the best bargains in “L” lenses and also the perfect long zoom for travelling due to its light weight.
This is a bargain L lens. You get great color and contrast, superb construction quality, and a constant aperture (plus internal zooming and focus).
Although it’s not as fast as its f/2.8 variant, it’s also almost a third of the price – a pretty good compromise!
If your lens collection consists of this, the 17-40L and a 50mm/1.4, you’d pretty much have all the pro quality you need at about $1600 – less than the price of one L/f2.8 zoom.
10 out of 10 points and recommended by alesl (3 reviews) and sharpenss, contrast, color, buid quality Excellent lens!
9 out of 10 points and recommended by pz (8 reviews) and light, sharp, low priced, L quality no IS 😉 not as good for full frame It was my first L lens. I loved it. Really. I used it with 10D, 20D, 5D. For 10D and 20D it was almost perfect. But for full frame it is – of course – less good. Using 5D at 70 mm its picture was always blurry or less sharp than I used with my old bodies. Once upon a time it was my best lens, but when I bought a 20-70 f/2.8 L I became think that I need a better telezoom, so I sold it for its new IS version. At the same time the IS also seemed to be a must for me.
9 out of 10 points and not recommended by hobbit (5 reviews) and Sharp, fast focusing, good image quality Got a yellow limon and returned it Well I got yellow lemon.
I was expecting to use this lens in moutains but it started giving me error 99 every second shot, so I had to switch to my old 18-55. This was very disappointing.
I returned it later to retailer. They checked it on a different body (30D) as they could not believe that such a lens can do such as thing. But it did same stuff on 30D. I was disappointed ( I lost quite a few shots) and decided not to exchange but just to return it.
When it worked it was giving excellent images. I liked everthing about it except QUALITY ASSURANCE!!!
I will not buy it again but possible will go with the IS version of it. It does make sense to spend some more money (if budget allows) on IS version as I find it very usefull on the telephoto range.
10 out of 10 points and recommended by nikoskard (17 reviews) and Sharp, LightWeight, Excellent Build, Inner Focusing/Zooming, Suberb Value For Money None so Far This Lens show exactly how Lens in this price range, and far, should be.
Excellent build, very smooth control, and excellent image quality.
Highly recommended. Can’t go wrong with this piece of equipment.
9 out of 10 points and recommended by shayel (1 reviews) and good price, great sharpness, fast auto focus, internal focus and zoom. f/4, too short zoom scale. I bought this lens second handed.
The first thing I noticed was the fast auto focus.
The focus ring is buttery smooth, the zoom ring is a bit lighter (maybe a bit too light…. but it’s not that bad)
It’s only problam is the short zoom scale but u get used to it really fast..
Overall it’s a great lens. U wouldn’t regreat buying it!
9 out of 10 points and recommended by softreq (5 reviews) and Sharp, light, reasonably contrasty, well priced. I guess the F4 max aperture. Nice light lens with excellent build quality.
Very sharp, reasonably contrasty.
Obviously an F2.8 max aperture would be better than the F4, but then it would be much more pricey if that were the case.
I think it’s a very good lens for outdoor or general photography.
10 out of 10 points and recommended by Anakin (5 reviews) and very sharp, light, construction, AF very fast no IS , no collar ring AF very good, image quality excellent, very sharp @ every focal lenght and aperture.
good for sports photos and reportage,
if you are in a sunny country , F4 is enough.
Canon EF 70-200mm f/4 USM L
Article Index Introduction Analysis Sample Images & Verdict Tweet Page 1 of 3 Review by Klaus Schroiff, published October 2005 Special thanks to Axel Voss and Anthony Harling for providing samples of this lens! Introduction When Canon released the Canon EF 70-200mm f/4 USM L back in 1999 it was a long awaited lens – not because it took so long from the announcement till availability but simply because the community was eagerly expecting a state-of-the art prosumer tele zoom. Till the EF 70-200mm f/4L saw the light serious amateurs had to choose between the affordable and good but also very aged EF 100-300mm f/5.6L and an extremely expensive and heavy-weight EF 70-200mm f/2.8 USM L.
As usual we’ll look into the performance of this lens using a mainstream APS-C DSLR (EOS 350D) where its field-of-view is equivalent to 116-320mm on full format cameras. The optical construction is made of 16 elements in 13 groups, including 1 CaF2 and 2 UD elements. The min. focus distance is 1.32m resulting is a max. object magnification of ~1:5 at 200mm. The lens features 8 aperture blades. The filter size is 67mm. The lens is pretty compact for a moderate aperture tele zoom with a size of 76x172mm and a weight of 705g so unlike its f/2.8 brothers and sisters it doesn’t feel like a brick in your camera bag. Adding the (included) barrel-shaped hood increases the length substantially as you can observe in the image above. Here’s a comparison between the EF 70-200mm f/4 USM L (left) and the EF 70-200mm f/2.8 USM L (right). The lens does not extend during zooming and thanks to its inner focusing system the front element does not rotate so using a polarizer is no problem – unless you attach the hood of course. The build quality of this lens is excellent – no wobbling and smooth controls. The lens features a ring-type USM drive so AF speed is extremely fast. When combined with the Canon EF 1.4x (II) converter the speed is reduced as a side effect of the smaller max. aperture (one stop slower). In theory it is also possible to use a Canon EF 2x (II) converter but the effective max. aperture of this combination drops to f/8 so all consumer grade Canon EOS (D)SLRs will disable AF operations – AF is retained on EOS 1(D) series cameras as well as on the EOS 3. By default the EF 70-200mm f/4L does NOT come with a dedicated tripod mount but it is available as an option either in black or white (the black one is slightly cheaper). The lens may be relatively light-weight but used on a tripod the camera-lens balance is quite bad so if you intend to use here the optional tripod mount is a good investment.
So you have finished reading the canon ef 70 200mm f 4l usm test topic article, if you find this article useful, please share it. Thank you very much. See more: Canon EF 70-200mm f 2.8L USM, canon 70-200 f4 cũ, Canon lens 70 200mm f4l USM, Canon 70 200 f4 IS II đánh giá, lens canon 70-200 f4 is ii cũ, canon 70-200 f4 review, sony 70-200 f4 cũ, 70-200 f4 non is